Chronic exposure to adverse psychosocial work factors and high psychological distress among white-collar workers: A 5-year prospective study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.01.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Chronic exposure to ERI was associated with high psychological distress.

  • The deleterious health effects of ERI were found among men and women.

  • A lack of adaptation to chronic ERI over time was observed.

  • Repeated ERI exposure led to greater prevalence than single baseline exposure.

Abstract

Objectives

Prospective studies which evaluated whether the effects of chronic exposure to psychosocial work factors on mental health persisted over time are scarce. For the first time, this study evaluated: 1) the effect of chronic exposure to effort-reward imbalance over 5 years on the prevalence of high psychological distress among men and women, and 2) the persistence of this effect over time.

Methods

Overall, 1747 white-collar workers from three public organizations participated in a prospective study. Psychological distress and effort-reward imbalance were measured using validated questionnaires at baseline, and at 3- and 5-year follow-ups. Prevalence ratios (PRs) of high psychological distress were estimated using log-binomial regression according to baseline and repeated exposure.

Results

Compared to unexposed workers, those with repeated exposure to effort-reward imbalance had a higher prevalence of high psychological distress. Workers exposed only at some time-points also had a higher prevalence. The deleterious effect of repeated exposure observed at the 3-year follow-up persisted at the 5-year follow-up among women (PR = 2.48 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.97–3.11) and men (PR = 1.91 95% CI 1.20–3.04). These effects were greater than those found using a single baseline measurement.

Conclusion

The current study supported a deleterious effect of repeated exposure to effort-reward imbalance on psychological distress, and a lack of adaptation to these effects over time among men and women. Since psychological distress may later lead to severe mental problems, current results highlight the need to consider exposure to these adverse work factors in primary and secondary preventions aimed at reducing mental health problems at work.

Section snippets

Study design and population

The current study used data from a large prospective cohort of 2335 white-collar workers from three public organizations in Quebec City, Canada. Their jobs encompassed the full range of white-collar positions (senior and middle managers, professionals, technicians and office workers). Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on their work characteristics and psychological distress at their workplace. Data were collected three times: at baseline in 2000–2003, and then at 3- and

Results

Overall 25.8% of men and 37.8% of women had high psychological distress in the current sample of white-collar workers. Men were more likely to hold professional and executive jobs, smoke, and have sedentary behavior. Women were less educated, had lower BMI, drank less alcohol, and reported more stressful events and greater home load than men. No meaningful gender difference was observed for ERI exposure (Table 1).

Table 2 presents PRs of high psychological distress at 3- and 5-year follow-ups

Discussion

In the present prospective study conducted among Canadian workers employed in white collar occupations, men and women having repeated exposure to ERI had a high prevalence of high psychological distress at follow-up. Compared to never exposed workers, those with exposure onset and exposure cessation also had a higher prevalence of high psychological distress at follow-up. The deleterious effects observed at 3-year persisted at 5-year follow-up, regardless of gender. Moreover, the effect of

Conclusion

The current study showed a deleterious effect of repeated exposure to ERI on high psychological distress, regardless gender. Moreover, there was a lack of adaptation to repeated exposure as the deleterious effects of ERI persisted over time. Finally, the effect of chronic exposure tends to be greater than the effect of single exposure. Future studies should evaluate the persistence of the effect of chronic exposure on psychological distress and other more severe and certified mental health

List of the author's contributions to the study

R. Ndjaboue supervised and synthesized the data analyses and led the writing. C. Brisson originated and supervised all aspects of the study. M. Vezina supervised the aspects of the study related to mental health measurement and supervised the public health issues of the study. D. Talbot participated to data analyses. All authors participated in reviewing and drafting the article.

Competiting interests

The authors have no competing interests to report.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by two grants from the CDC-NIOSH (Grant R01 OH007647-02) and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (Grant GIR—91062). C. Brisson was a Canadian Institutes of Health Research investigator when this work was conducted. This research was also supported by a scholarship from the Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité au travail for R. Ndjaboue.

References (56)

  • IMS Health Canada

    Disease Dynamics in 2009; Insight and Outlook from IMS Health

    (2010)
  • C.S. Dewa et al.

    Incidence rates of sickness absence related to mental disorders: a systematic literature review

    BMC Public Health

    (2014)
  • M. Vezina et al.

    Psychosocial stresses of work and mental health problems in Quebec: an analysis of the gender

    Can. J. Public Health

    (2010)
  • M.F. Hilton et al.

    The prevalence of psychological distress in employees and associated occupational risk factors

    J. Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2008)
  • D.K. Cherry et al.

    National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 Summary. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics

    (2007)
  • A. Marchand et al.

    Do occupation and work conditions really matter? A longitudinal analysis of psychological distress experiences among Canadian workers

    Sociol. Health Illn.

    (2005)
  • T. Theorell et al.

    A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms

    BMC Public Health

    (2015)
  • J.P. Bonde

    Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence

    Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2008)
  • K. Nieuwenhuijsen et al.

    Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review

    Occup. Med.

    (2010)
  • B. Netterstrom et al.

    The relation between work-related psychosocial factors and the development of depression

    Epidemiol Rev.

    (2008)
  • J. Siegrist

    Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions

    J. Occup. Health Psychol.

    (1996)
  • M. Calnan et al.

    Job strain, effort–reward imbalance, and stress at work: competing or complementary models?

    Scand. J. Public Health

    (2004)
  • S.A. Stansfeld et al.

    Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II study

    Occup. Environ. Med.

    (1999)
  • H. Kuper et al.

    When reciprocity fails: effort-reward imbalance in relation to coronary heart disease and health functioning within the Whitehall II study

    Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2002)
  • J.M. Griffin et al.

    The effect of self-reported and observed job conditions on depression and anxiety symptoms: a comparison of theoretical models

    J. Occup. Health Psychol.

    (2007)
  • M. Kivimaki et al.

    Effort-reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: complementary or redundant models?

    Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2007)
  • K.J. Rothman et al.

    Modern Epidemiology

    (2008)
  • I. Godin et al.

    A prospective study of cumulative job stress in relation to mental health

    BMC Public Health

    (2005)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Occupational Health and Well-being Questionnaire (OHWQ): an instrument to assess psychosocial risk and protective factors in the workplace

      2022, Public Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Exposure to these factors increases the probability of adverse effects on the physical and psychological health of workers.10 Over the past four decades of empirical research, a large number of prospective studies synthesized in numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have consistently shown that PRW contribute to mental health problems,11–14 high blood pressure,15–20 the incidence and recurrence of cardiovascular diseases,21,22 diabetes,23,24 and musculoskeletal problems.25–27 These chronic health problems are leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide.28

    • Occupational stress in Spanish police officers: Validating the effort-reward imbalance questionnaire

      2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    View full text