Review article
Effectiveness of traditional meditation retreats: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.11.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We conducted a meta-analysis to provide a review of traditional meditation retreats.

  • The meta-analysis included 21 studies enrolling 2,912 participants.

  • Psychological outcomes and mindfulness levels were measured in healthy populations.

  • We obtained Hedge's g = .49 in between group analyses, .45 in pre-post analyses.

  • .

  • Mindfulness levels strongly moderated clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Background

An increasing number of studies are investigating traditional meditation retreats. Very little, however, is known about their effectiveness.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of meditation retreats on improving psychological outcomes in general population.

Data sources

A systematic review of studies published in journals or as dissertations in PSYCINFO, PUBMED, CINAHL or Web of Science from the first available date until October 22, 2016.

Review methods

A total of 20 papers (21 studies, N = 2912) were included.

Results

Effect-size estimates of outcomes combined suggested that traditional meditation retreats are moderately effective in pre-post analyses (n = 19; Hedge's g = 0.45; 95% CI [0.35, 0.54], p < 0.00001) and in analyses comparing retreats to controls (n = 14; Hedge's g = 0.49; 95% CI [0.36, 0.61], p < 0.00001). Results were maintained at follow-up. No differences were observed between meditation styles. Results suggested large effects on measures of anxiety, depression and stress, and moderate effects on measures of emotional regulation and quality of life. As to potential mechanisms of actions, results showed large effects on measures of mindfulness and compassion, and moderate effects on measures of acceptance. In addition, changes in mindfulness levels strongly moderated clinical effect sizes. However, heterogeneity was significant among trials, probably due to differences in study designs, types and duration of the retreats and assessed outcomes, limiting therefore the implications of the results.

Conclusion

Meditation retreats are moderately to largely effective in reducing depression, anxiety, stress and in ameliorating the quality of life of participants.

Introduction

Meditation has been employed as a spiritual and healing practice for > 5000 years. One of the most ancient texts dealing with meditation is the Yoga Sutra[1]. According to the Yoga Sutras, meditation is the act of inward contemplation and the intermediate state between mere attention to an object and complete absorption within it [2]. Also, the Pāli and Sanskrit term bhāvanā that is commonly translated as meditation translates as “cultivating” and the translation of the Tibetan equivalent sgom may translate as “getting used to” or “familiarizing oneself” [3]. One of the most commonly cited classifications of meditation practices suggests a fundamental distinction between two main meditative styles, mindfulness meditations (MM)/open monitoring meditations and concentrative meditations (CM)/focused attention meditations, depending on how the attentional processes are directed [4], [5]. While MM are characterized by open, non-judgmental awareness of the sensory and cognitive fields and include a meta-awareness or observation of the ongoing contents of thought, CM involve focused attention on a given object such as an image or a mantra, while excluding potential sources of distractions [6], [7]. It is worth mentioning that both types of meditation share a common background of focused attention but they subsequently take different directions depending on the specific meditation form [5], [8], [9]. Although different traditional paths place different emphasis upon MM and CM, there is general agreement that both types of meditation should be cultivated and that they could lead not only to spiritual achievements but also to significant health outcomes (e.g., [10], [11]).

Taking into account the long history of traditional meditation practices and the potential benefits for health outcomes, it is surprising that up to recently, very little effort has been directed toward the clinical investigation of health outcomes derived from these traditional meditation practices. Indeed, most studies dealing with meditation focused on recently developed standardized mindfulness-based programs such as Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR; [12], [13]), Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT; 14), and other meditation programs closely linked to MBSR and MBCT, such as Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP; 15). Despite the considerable variation among mindfulness-based protocols, multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses were conducted and found similar positive effects on both physical and psycho-physiological outcomes among clinical and nonclinical populations [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials using the standardized MBSR or MBCT programs found significant improvements in symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, and physical functioning in comparison with control groups such as wait list and treatment as usual [25]. Similar results were found in a review of 16 meta-analyses investigating the effects of MBSR or MBCT in clinical populations [26].

While the mechanisms of action of these modern meditation-based treatments are not yet fully understood, many authors point toward the key role of attention and emotional regulation processes in their effectiveness (e.g., [27], [28], [29]). A recent mediation analysis of 20 studies found strong, consistent evidence for reduced cognitive and emotional reactivity, moderate and consistent evidence for reduced rumination and worrying, and preliminary but insufficient evidence for increased self-compassion and psychological flexibility as mechanisms underlying mindfulness-based interventions [30].

As mentioned above, although most meditation studies focused on recent standardized mindfulness-based interventions, it is worth mentioning that for centuries meditation has been primarily taught within the context of traditional spiritual paths and/or in intensive retreats, mainly based upon Vipassana and Shamatha practices. It is therefore surprising that up to recently, only a few studies specifically addressed this topic.

Vipassana meditation (VM), typically acknowledged as one of the main MM practices [7], is supposed to be the meditation practiced by Gautama the Buddha > 2500 years ago and is the most ancient of Buddhist meditations [31]. Literally, Vipassana means “insight”. Individuals practicing VM assume the role of an observer of their thoughts and sensations. In doing so, they learn to be less judgmental. The main aim is to remain aware in the present moment and to achieve increased equanimity and insight into the fleeting nature of the self, which, in this process, is acknowledged as an ever-changing flow of psychophysical phenomena, void of any lasting self [32]. VM is currently typically taught in the West in a standardized intervention in form of a 10-day retreat as in the tradition lead by S. N. Goenka [33]. Course attendees practice up to eleven hours of meditation each day and watch videotaped discourses delivered by Goenka, which explicate Buddhist views of suffering, attachment, and craving.

In Shamatha meditation (SM), typically acknowledged as one of the main CM practices [5], cognitive resources are directed toward a chosen target and away from uncontrolled, ruminative thoughts and cognitive perseverations [34]. During SM, the faculty of focusing attention on a given object such as the breath without distraction is trained. Shamatha includes introductory meditation practices in the Buddhist context for the development of a relaxed, stable, and clear mind [35]. Shamatha can be practiced for a few minutes daily or as an intensive meditation training - a retreat - for days, months, or even years. As the meditation practitioner engages in Shamatha practice, it is thought that he/she can progressively improve the ability to develop focused attention [5], [8].

In addition, in several Buddhist traditions, a third form of meditation, often referred to as “non-referential compassion”, is frequently cultivated [36]. This form of meditation aims at cultivating an intensive state of loving-kindness and can be viewed as different from mindfulness meditation. However, loving-kindness meditation shares strong resemblances with mindfulness practices. In fact, loving-kindness meditation has no specific object or focus and aims at cultivating an objectless awareness. Accordingly, it is considered by many authors and Buddhist masters as a variation of the mindfulness/OM meditation (e.g. 36).

Most of traditional meditation programs are delivered in form of a retreat based on VM, SM, or on a combination of both techniques and might include at times cultivating benevolent mental states, namely loving-kindness, compassion, empathic joy, and equanimity [34], [37]. An increasing number of studies investigated these traditional meditation retreats in the last two decades. However, no meta-analysis directly examined their effectiveness so far.

Previous reviews included a few studies using intensive meditation or retreats without focusing explicitly on the effects of meditation retreats. For example, a systematic review of three clinical studies in incarcerated populations [38] found that VM reduced alcohol and substance abuse but not post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among prisoners. A meta-analysis [18] examined meditation programs globally including transcendental meditation, mindfulness-based interventions, and traditional MM, but did not separately report outcomes of traditional MM programs. Another meta-analysis [39], which comprised both mindfulness-based interventions and traditional MM programs, included three studies on meditation retreats. Results suggested that traditional MM programs might be less effective than mindfulness-based interventions. However, this meta-analysis as other reviews did not focus explicitly on the effectiveness of meditation retreats, which constitute the most traditional forms of MM programs.

Section snippets

Objectives

To address the current gap about the effectiveness of traditional meditation retreats, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using traditional meditation retreats. The objectives are as follows: [1] to quantify the magnitude of the effects of retreats on psychological outcomes; [2] to quantify the change of mindfulness levels, as well as of other possible moderators of outcomes, following the retreats and at the last follow-up; and [3] to explore moderator variables of

Eligibility criteria

To be included in this meta-analysis, the publication had to meet the following criteria: [1] be published in the English language; [2] be included in the databases mentioned above; [3] include any type of traditional meditation retreat; [4] use any experimental or quasi-experimental design and [5] examine psychological outcome measures. Articles were excluded from this review due to the following criteria: [1] studies that did not evaluate the meditation program or implemented a qualitative

Study selection

PSYCINFO searches produced 805 publications, PubMed searches generated 201 publications, CINAHL searches yielded 97 publications, and Web of Science produced 355. We carefully assessed the identified publications and applied the exclusion criteria resulting in 83 publications that were thoroughly assessed. We manually added four publications that were referenced in the assessed publications, and then eliminated the publications that did not fit our inclusion criteria. This resulted in a final

Summary of evidence

This meta-analysis examined 20 papers (21 studies) of meditation retreats for a combined total of 2912 participants. The results showed that traditional meditation retreats were moderately effective for improved psychological outcomes in healthy populations in both within-group and between-group analyses (i.e., in comparison to a waitlist or to an active treatment). Three studies compared meditation retreats to active treatments; the effect sizes were small to moderate but cannot be generalized

Limitations

Limitations of this meta-analysis comprise the limited number of included studies and the high heterogeneity among some study groups, reducing as a consequence the specificity of the obtained results. Furthermore, the assessed outcomes varied widely from study to study. Due to the limited number of available studies, we also inevitably included studies with different levels of quality, which we quantified via the study quality score and included in the analyses. To address our own expectancy

Conclusions

Despite the limitations, our results showed that meditation retreats are moderately to largely effective, specifically for symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression among a healthy population. In addition, the findings suggest that increases in mindfulness might be a central component of the retreats' effectiveness. These results have important clinical implications and might encourage individuals with mild to moderate symptoms of stress, anxiety, or depression to engage in intensive

Funding

No funding was provided to conduct this study.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors of this article had access to all study data, are responsible for all contents of the article, and had authority over manuscript preparation and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Authors of this article have approved the submission of the manuscript to the journal and have no competing interests. The data presented in the article is novel and has not yet been presented elsewhere.

Acknowledgment

No official funding was provided to conduct the current meta-analysis. All authors have actively participated in this manuscript. The authors have no competing interests to report. The first author (B.K.) led the meta-analysis in all the stages and worked on the data collection, analyses, and report writing, he has full access to all of the data in the meta-analysis and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the reported analyses. The second author (B.K.)

References (67)

  • P. Klainin-Yobas et al.

    Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions on depressive symptoms among people with mental disorders: a meta-analysis

    Int. J. Nurs. Stud.

    (2012)
  • J. Piet et al.

    The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for prevention of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Clin. Psychol. Rev.

    (2011)
  • F. Falkenström

    Studying mindfulness in experienced meditators: a quasi-experimental approach

    Personal. Individ. Differ.

    (2010)
  • T.L. Jacobs et al.

    Intensive meditation training, immune cell telomerase activity, and psychological mediators

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2011)
  • J.R. Krygier et al.

    Mindfulness meditation, well-being, and heart rate variability: a preliminary investigation into the impact of intensive Vipassana meditation

    Int. J. Psychophysiol.

    (2013)
  • B.D. Ostafin et al.

    Intensive mindfulness training and the reduction of psychological distress: a preliminary study

    Cogn. Behav. Pract.

    (2006)
  • S.S. Satchidananda

    The Yoga Sutra of Patanjali

    (2012)
  • E. Taylor

    Introduction

  • A. Chiesa et al.

    Mindfulness-based approaches: are they all the same?

    J. Clin. Psychol.

    (2011)
  • D. Goleman

    The Meditative Mind: The Varieties of Meditative Experience

    (1988)
  • B.R. Cahn et al.

    Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2006)
  • M.B. Ospina et al.

    Meditation Practices for Health: State of the Research

    (2007)
  • L. Rapgay et al.

    Classical mindfulness: an introduction to its theory and practice for clinical application

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2009)
  • R. Gilpin

    The use of Theravāda Buddhist practices and perspectives in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy

    Contemp. Buddhism.

    (2008)
  • P. Kapleau

    The Three Pillars of Zen: Teaching, Practice and Enlightenment

    (1965)
  • J. Kabat-Zinn

    Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness

    (1991)
  • Z.V. Segal et al.

    Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: a new approach to preventing relapse

  • S. Bowen et al.

    Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders: a pilot efficacy trial

    Subst. Abus.

    (2009)
  • S.G. Hofmann et al.

    The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (2010)
  • P. Sedlmeier et al.

    The psychological effects of meditation: a meta-analysis

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2012)
  • A. Chiesa et al.

    Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: a review and meta-analysis

    J. Altern. Complement. Med.

    (2009)
  • A. Chiesa et al.

    A systematic review of neurobiological and clinical features of mindfulness meditations

    Psychol. Med.

    (2010)
  • A. Chiesa et al.

    Are mindfulness-based interventions effective for substance use disorders? A systematic review of the evidence

    Subst. Use Misuse

    (2013)
  • Cited by (73)

    • Mindfulness

      2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3
    • Pavlovian-based neurofeedback enhances meta-awareness of mind-wandering

      2023, Neural Networks
      Citation Excerpt :

      This also may contribute to the study of MBI. The mechanism by which MBI reduces depression (Khoury, Knäuper, Schlosser, Carrière, & Chiesa, 2017; Khoury et al., 2013) and enhances creativity (Lebuda, Zabelina, & Karwowski, 2016) is unclear, and researchers have found that various factors complexly interact to bring about these outcomes (Shapiro, Carlson, Astin, & Freedman, 2006; Tang et al., 2015). Part of those effects might be understood as enhancing meta-awareness by repeatedly practicing being aware of and observing one’s MW (Konjedi & Maleeh, 2017; Teasdale et al., 2000; Vago, 2014) and thereby controlling the function of MW.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text