The placebo effect in inflammatory skin reactions: The influence of verbal suggestion on itch and weal size

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.01.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Placebo effect demonstrated in inflammatory skin reactions.

  • Verbal suggestion can reduce the experience of itch.

  • A concrete representation of suggested effects may be important.

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate suggestion-induced placebo effects in inflammatory skin reactions.

Methods

A healthy sample of volunteers (N = 48) attended two laboratory sessions. In each, a local short term inflammatory skin reaction was induced with histamine. Participants were told that one session was a control session and the other was a treatment session in which an antihistamine cream would be applied to the arm to reduce the size of the weal and the experience of itch. Inert aqueous cream was applied in both sessions. Participants were randomly allocated to undergo either the control or the treatment session first.

Results

The placebo manipulation successfully reduced self-reported itch from the control to the placebo treatment session, but no placebo effect was demonstrated in weal size. Order effects were observed such that only those who underwent control procedures first had a smaller weal in the placebo treatment session as compared to the control session. The same order effect was seen for reported itch at one minute post histamine administration, but this disappeared at the three and five minute measures.

Conclusion

Findings suggest that explicit verbal suggestion can reduce the experience of itch. In addition to conscious awareness, a concrete representation of the suggested changes gained from prior experience to the stimulus may be an important component of placebo effects on inflammatory skin reactions.

Introduction

The relative importance of psychological factors in skin conditions such as urticaria continues to be debated [1], but there is empirical evidence to suggest that they can influence the experience of itch [2], [3] and contribute to idiopathic conditions such as chronic spontaneous urticaria [4]. The way an individual thinks and feels appears to impact the status of the skin; however, whether this ‘mind–body’ relationship can be harnessed to ameliorate the symptoms of skin conditions is less clear.

The placebo effect is an intriguing phenomenon in which individuals experience benefit from pharmacologically inert treatments [5]. Expectation, an established mechanism of some placebo effects, is when the patient or participant's expectation of improvement generates real psychobiological changes [6]. Explicit suggestion of benefit is often used to induce expectations, such as providing verbal instructions that a treatment cream will reduce the experience of pain [7]. Placebo-induced expectations are thought to modulate internal homeostatic processes by activating top-down, neurobiological pathways [6], [8]. Thus, placebo research has been described as investigations into the ‘impact of expectations on brain–mind–body interactions’ [9 p. 1922].

While psychological factors are known to influence the immune system [10], there is a paucity of evidence demonstrating that placebo expectancy can exert changes on immune parameters [11]. One possible reason for this is that certain placebo protocols may be more appropriate for the manipulation of certain outcomes. For example, those outcomes of which we are consciously aware (such as pain or motor function) can be influenced by suggestion, unlike those that are not consciously detectable, such as hormone release [12]. Therefore, in order for a suggestive placebo protocol to be effective, a conscious awareness of the suggested changes may be needed [13]. Given the nature of the immune system, this type of awareness is often not possible; however, inflammatory skin reactions can be seen and felt [14], and may be an appropriate target for suggestive placebo protocols.

Only a few studies have attempted to influence inflammatory skin reactions by way of suggestive placebo protocols. One study aimed to reduce histamine induced skin reactions with verbal suggestion and the application of topical ‘anti-histamine’ (placebo) cream [15]. While the manipulation was not successful, the suggestion did not explicitly suggest a smaller weal size or a reduction in perceived itch, but instead a ‘dampened’ response to the histamine. Another study demonstrated a suggestion-induced increase in itchiness, but the suggestion of decreased itchiness was not successful [16]. A recent study demonstrated that while verbal suggestion alone did not modulate itch, placebo effects were demonstrated when suggestion was coupled with a conditioning procedure [17].

While attempts to demonstrate placebo effects in this area have been more successful when conditioning protocols are employed [11], hypnosis (a form of suggestion) can influence immune parameters [18], cognitive-hypnotic protocols have been shown to modulate local inflammatory skin reactions [10], [19], [20], [21], and emotion and arousal mood states can affect hypersensitivity skin reactions [22], [23]. Further, reviews of placebo responses arising from the placebo-control arm of allergy treatment trials found placebo treatments can reduce skin symptoms [24], [25]. The possibility that local inflammatory skin reactions may be modifiable by suggestion alone remains worthy of investigation.

The aim of the current study was to investigate whether a histamine-induced inflammatory skin reaction could be modulated by a suggestive placebo protocol. Explicit suggestions of a reduced weal size and less itching were provided conjointly with a topical ‘anti-histamine’ (placebo) cream. It was hypothesised that when the application of the cream combined with the suggestion of a reduced reaction, participants would experience reduced itchiness and a smaller weal size.

Section snippets

Design, randomization and blinding

This was a randomized, cross-over, experimental study using a deceptive placebo protocol. Participants were told that the study was investigating the relationship between personality and allergic responses, and each participant attended two laboratory sessions. Local type-I hypersensitivity-like skin reactions were induced on both arms in each session (histamine prick tests). Participants were told that one session was a control session, and the other a treatment session in which an

Preliminary analyses

Between-group tests were carried out to assess potential baseline group differences (Table 1). Analyses revealed there was a trend for a between-group difference in the incidence of allergies (Table 1); so as a cautionary measure, tests were run with allergies as a covariate. Because negative mood has been linked to weal size in prior work [23], a test assessing whether negative mood changed from the first session to the second session (i.e., regardless of whether it was a control or treatment

Discussion

This study investigated whether a suggestive placebo protocol could induce a placebo effect in local inflammatory skin reactions. The placebo manipulation was successful in reducing self-reported itch from control to treatment session, the order of session notwithstanding. No placebo effect was demonstrated on weal size; however, there was an order effect, with a reduction in weal size from control to treatment only in the group that underwent control procedures first.

To date, this is the first

Conflict of interest statement & submission declaration

Margot Darragh, Joshua (W-H) Chang, Roger J Booth, and Nathan S Consedine declare that they have no conflict of interest. The study was funded wholly by the University of Auckland. This manuscript has not been published nor is in submission elsewhere. The authors of this article had access to all study data, are responsible for all contents of the article, and had authority over manuscript preparation and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Ethical approval and informed consent

The study was approved by the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards; with the following note. In generating a placebo response via suggestion, an element of deception was required. Participants were led to believe that the cream they received during the treatment session was anti-histamine, when in fact it was

References (31)

  • U Gieler et al.

    Psyche and skin: what's new?

    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol

    (2003)
  • M Ben-Shoshan et al.

    Psychosocial factors and chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review

    Allergy

    (2013)
  • F Benedetti

    Placebo and the new physiology of the doctor–patient relationship

    Physiol Rev

    (2013)
  • F Benedetti

    Placebo effects: understanding the mechanisms in health and disease [electronic resource]

  • L Colloca et al.

    Role of expectations in health

    Curr Opin Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Topical drug delivery: History, percutaneous absorption, and product development

      2021, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Importantly, cultural differences also affect responses, so that, for instance, blue is used to "inspire" the Italian soccer team and yellow equates to the better antimalarial drugs in Africa. In addition, verbal comments and prior experiences partly determine the itch response to an applied antihistamine cream [389]. It is not just response but adherence that can be impacted by placebo and nocebo effects.

    • Placebo and nocebo effects for itch and itch-related immune outcomes: A systematic review of animal and human studies

      2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Four studies investigated placebo effect induction by positive verbal suggestions exclusively. Expected itch, pain or skin responses were reduced following positive suggestions in all studies (Darragh et al., 2013, 2015b; Peerdeman et al., 2015; Skvortsova et al., 2018). Three studies assessed histamine-induced itch (Darragh et al., 2015b; Peerdeman et al., 2015; Skvortsova et al., 2018), but only one of these found lower itch following suggestions (Darragh et al., 2015b).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text