Moderators of the treatment response to guided self-instruction for chronic fatigue syndrome
Introduction
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is characterized by medically unexplained, prolonged and disabling fatigue. According to the widely used consensus criteria of the US Center for Disease Control, there have to be at least four of the following eight additional symptoms present for the CFS diagnoses to be warranted: sleep that does not alleviate fatigue, post-exertion malaise, headaches, muscle pain, multi-joint pain, sore throat, tender lymph nodes, and impaired concentration or memory [1]. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is directed at changing cognitions and behaviours that perpetuate fatigue [2] and has been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue and disabilities in patients with CFS [3], [4]. However, CBT for CFS is only effective after 13–16 sessions [5], [6], [7], [8]. As not all patients need such intensive treatment, a self-guided intervention has been developed [9], based on the protocol of CBT for CFS. Instead of face-to-face sessions, patients go through a self-help booklet with assignments, at their own pace and with email guidance from a therapist.
Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the effectiveness of guided self-instruction for CFS compared to patients with CFS on a wait list [9], [10]. The first RCT was performed in a tertiary treatment centre. Cognitive behavioural therapists who had extensive experience in treating patients with CBT for CFS carried out the intervention [9]. In the second RCT, psychiatric nurses in a community-based mental health-care centre (MHC) were trained to deliver the guided self-instruction. Before the start of the study the psychiatric nurses were unacquainted with CBT and the treatment of CFS [10]. In both trials patients who followed the minimal intervention reported a significant reduction in fatigue [9], [10]. However, the minimal intervention sufficed for only a subgroup of the patients. Patients who did not profit from the minimal intervention were referred to additional CBT. It has been shown that patients can profit from additional CBT if the minimal intervention is unsuccessful [11].
Stepped care for CFS, consisting of guided self-instruction and followed by additional CBT if needed, offers the opportunity to make the treatment of CFS more efficient. Efficiency can be further enhanced if patients who are likely to profit from the minimal intervention can be identified. Identifying moderators is a way to understand the variability of outcomes in psychosocial interventions. Knowing moderators of guided self-instruction will inform which patients are likely to benefit from the intervention. It has already been shown that patients with an extremely high level of disabilities profit less from the minimal intervention compared to those without severe disabilities [9]. These patients may have better treatment outcomes with regular CBT than with the minimal intervention.
Studies that investigated moderators and predictors of treatment outcome in face-to-face CBT for CFS were reviewed. These studies show that focusing on bodily symptoms and attributing symptoms to a physical cause are related to poor treatment outcomes [12], [13]. However, evidence concerning the latter is contradictory [6], [13], [14]. Additionally, patients with a high sense of control with respect to fatigue gain greater benefit from CBT than those with a low sense of control [6] and patients with a low activity pattern tend to show less improvement following CBT compared to those with a high activity pattern [6]. After adapting the treatment manual of CBT for CFS, the relation between the level of physical activity and treatment outcome was no longer present [15]. Good CBT treatment outcomes are associated with a change in avoidance of activity and related beliefs [16]. The prognostic role of depression is still unclear. Some studies found that depression was negatively related to treatment outcomes, whereas others found no relation [17], [18], [19]. A recently published study found that baseline levels of depressive symptoms, measured with the HADS, significantly moderated fatigue at 1-year follow-up in an behavioural minimal intervention for CFS [20]. In contrast with these findings Prins et al. [18] found that patients with depression and psychological distress benefited from CBT as much as others. There is also evidence to suggest that high levels of pain are negatively correlated with treatment outcome [21]. In addition, treatment seems to be less successful when patients are older, are members of a self-help group, are involved in a legal procedure concerning disability related benefits, or received a disablement insurance benefit [6], [7], [17].
This study investigated whether factors that are related to treatment outcome in CBT, are moderators of response to guided self-instruction on fatigue. Most studies use the continuous post-treatment score in fatigue as a dependent variable to gain insight in predictors or moderators of treatment outcome instead of significant clinical improvement in fatigue. However, the latter is clinically more meaningful. Therefore, in post-hoc analyses we aimed to identify moderators of post-treatment fatigue (continuous) and significant clinical improvement in fatigue (dichotomous) following guided self-instruction. Analysis were adjusted for baseline levels of fatigue.
Section snippets
Method
This study is a secondary analysis of data obtained in two RCTs (NTR570 and NTR1223) that tested the effectiveness of guided self-instruction for CFS compared with people with CFS who were on a wait list. Patients doing the guided self-instruction went through a booklet with assignments. They did this at their own pace, and they had email contact with a therapist. Patients on the wait list received CBT or the minimal intervention after a delay of six months. Both trials showed that after guided
Baseline characteristics
Both groups (intervention versus wait list) were similar at baseline in terms of the potential moderator variables. There were no significant imbalances (Table 1).
Moderator analyses
Linear regression analyses showed three significant moderators by treatment effect, namely age (b = 0.15, p < 0.05), level of depressive symptoms (b = 0.15, p = 0.04) and avoidance of activity (b = 0.17, p = 0.04) (Table 2). Young patients, patients with low levels of depression, and low tendency to avoid activity benefited more from the
Discussion
In this study we examined moderators of treatment outcome of guided self-instruction. Three moderators of treatment outcome were found. All moderators were independently related to treatment outcome. Age was found to be a significant moderator of treatment outcome when using linear regression analyses. Patients who were older benefited less from the intervention than young patients. The range of age was from 18 to 68 years. It was not possible to determine above what age immediate regular CBT is
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Rogier Donders for advising us on the statistical analysis.
References (31)
- et al.
The persistence of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis: development of a model
J Psychosom Res
(1998) - et al.
Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a meta-analysis
Clin Psychol Rev
(2008) - et al.
Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Cognitive-behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of outcomes within and outside the confines of a randomised controlled trial
Behav Res Ther
(2007) - et al.
Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: predictors of treatment outcome
- et al.
Illness beliefs and treatment outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome
J Psychosom Res
(1998) - et al.
Is cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome also effective for pain symptoms?
Behav Res Ther
(2007) - et al.
Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome
J Psychosom Res
(1994) - et al.
The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for clinicians and researchers
J Psychosom Res
(2004) - et al.
Screening for major depression disorders in medical inpatients with the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care
Behav Res Ther
(1997)
Use of the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care to screen for major depression disorders
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
Ways of coping with chronic fatigue syndrome: development of an illness management questionnaire
Soc Sci Med
Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
BMC Health Serv Res
Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
Br Med J
Cited by (14)
Fatigue severity and avoidance among individuals with chronic disease: A meta-analysis
2022, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :Fifteen studies examined individuals with multiple sclerosis [61,65,73,97–108]. Fourteen studies examined individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalomyelitis and/or chronic fatigue immune dysfunction [32,60,63–65,70–72,76,109–113], five with rheumatoid arthritis [65,75,114–116]; and two studies with fibromyalgia [65,77], irritable bowel disease [69,77], systemic lupus erythematosus [65,67], and heart disease or heart failure [117,118]. One study was included examining: end-stage kidney disease [119], vulvodynia [120], asthma [76], antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis [75], atrial fibrillation [121], stroke [122], non-specific chronic low back pain [123], and late-onset sequelae of poliomyelitis [124].
Depression and Coping Behaviors Are Key Factors in Understanding Pain in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome
2018, Pain Management NursingCitation Excerpt :Additionally, these findings suggest depression may be an additional risk factor for increased pain in the IC/BPS population. This moderating effect of depression is similar to that found in studies examining other psychosocial variables and pain (Tummers, Knoop, van Dam, & Bleijenberg, 2013). Examination of alternate models revealed that both sensory and affective pain had a direct effect on catastrophizing.
Fatigue Is Associated With Altered Monitoring and Preparation of Physical Effort in Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
2018, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingCitation Excerpt :Accordingly, it remains to be tested in larger HC groups whether these relationships are specific to patients with CFS or whether they reflect one end of a continuum. Finally, it remains to be seen whether changing dysfunctional beliefs, as achievable with cognitive behavioral therapy (28–30,51–55), leads to corresponding changes in DLPFC/vACC activity and/or SMA connectivity during feedback processing. We are testing this hypothesis in an ongoing randomized controlled trial (36).
Differential effects of behavioral interventions with a graded physical activity component in patients suffering from Chronic Fatigue (Syndrome): An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
2015, Clinical Psychology ReviewCitation Excerpt :It may be the case that patients with more severe psychological distress or co-existing mood disorders will benefit more from additional emotional regulation approaches (e.g. CBT for mood disorders). In fact, two recent trials have found that depressive symptoms were a significant moderator of treatment effects (Tummers, Knoop, van Dam, & Bleijenberg, 2013; Wearden et al., 2012). Future reviews could address the potential moderator effect of psychological distress in a wide range of trials.