Scientific inbreeding and same-team replication: Type D personality as an example

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.09.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Replication is essential for validating correct results, sorting out false-positive early discoveries, and improving the accuracy and precision of estimated effects. However, some types of seemingly successful replication may foster a spurious notion of increased credibility, if they are performed by the same team and propagate or extend the same errors made by the original discoveries. Besides same-team replication, replication by other teams may also succumb to inbreeding, if it cannot fiercely maintain its independence. These patterns include obedient replication and obliged replication. I discuss these replication patterns in the context of associations and effects in the psychological sciences, drawing from the criticism of Coyne and de Voogd of the proposed association between type D personality and cardiovascular mortality and other empirical examples.

Section snippets

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

References (36)

  • S Schroter et al.

    What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

    J R Soc Med

    (2008)
  • S Schmidt

    Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences

    Rev Gen Psychol

    (2009)
  • SA Greenberg

    How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network

    BMJ

    (2009)
  • J Schooler

    Unpublished results hide the decline effect

    Nature

    (2011)
  • A Tatsioni et al.

    Persistence of contradicted claims in the literature

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • J Denollet et al.

    Personality and mortality after myocardial infarction

    Psychosom Med

    (1995)
  • A Volz et al.

    Predictors of readmission and health related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: a comparison of different psychosocial aspects

    J Behav Med

    (2011)
  • G Grande et al.

    Type D personality and all-cause mortality in cardiac patients—data from a German cohort study

    Psychosom Med

    (2011)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Vital personality scores and healthy aging: Life-course associations and familial transmission

      2021, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      An example is the literature on personality types linked with health, such as the “Type A” personality and cardiovascular disease (Smith et al., 2012). However, there is a lack of consensus about which profiles or types to use; a patchy replication history of specific profiles; and a pattern of inconsistent associations between personality profiles and health (Costa et al., 2002; Ioannidis, 2012; Myrtek, 1995). The vital personality score addresses some of these concerns and represents a straightforward and parsimonious way to represent personality contributions to healthy aging.

    • Changing the logic of replication: A case from infant studies

      2020, Infant Behavior and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      The two classes, however, are not equivalent, as there is evidence that internal replications have a much higher probability of being interpreted as confirmatory than external replications (e.g., Coyne, 2016). This phenomenon is also known as the same team science effect, and perhaps can be in part due to the fact that the original laboratory has better expertise or ability to conduct closer replications (Ioannidis, 2012). But there is also the risk of confirmation bias.

    • The decline effect in evaluations of the impact of the Strengthening Families Program for Youth 10-14 (SFP 10-14) on adolescent substance use

      2017, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, and as will be discussed below, even when replication studies are undertaken, there is a tendency to explain away their findings if they do not support those of the original study. Ioannidis (2012b) discusses the possible mechanisms whereby an idea is introduced into the scientific literature through a body of initially positive, but spurious, results. The first stage of the process involves a research team conducting a plethora of analyses, reporting the “best results” that emerge from these, and failing to document and disclose those that support the null hypothesis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text