Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 72, Issue 4 , Pages 251-257, April 2012

Type D (distressed) personality in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: Validation and clinical correlates of the DS14 assessment

  • Giesje Nefs
  • ,
  • François Pouwer
  • ,
  • Victor Pop
  • ,
  • Johan Denollet

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, PO BOX 90153 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 13 466 2390; fax: +31 13 466 2067.

Received 21 October 2011; received in revised form 23 December 2011; accepted 4 January 2012. published online 30 January 2012.

Abstract 

Objective

In cardiovascular research, Type D personality (high negative affectivity and social inhibition) has been associated with a more than 3-fold increased risk of adverse health outcomes. This study examined the validity and clinical correlates of the Type D construct as assessed by the Type D Scale-14 (DS14) in type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods

1553 primary care patients with type 2 diabetes were assessed for demographic, clinical, lifestyle and psychological characteristics in 2007. A subgroup (n=1012) completed the DS14 again 1year later.

Results

The two-factor model of the Type D construct was confirmed in exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses; results were stable across gender. The Negative Affectivity (NA) and Social Inhibition (SI) subscales had adequate reliability in both men and women, as measured by Cronbach's alpha (NA=0.87, SI=0.83), lambda2 (NA=0.87/0.88, SI=0.84), corrected item-total correlations (NA 0.47–0.77, SI 0.34–0.72) and mean inter-item correlations (NA=0.50/0.51, SI=0.42). One year test–retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients was 0.64/0.63 for NA and 0.73/0.65 for SI. Type D and non-Type D patients did not differ in vascular history or physiological risk factors, but Type D women had a more sedentary lifestyle (p=.003). Type D patients experienced less social support and more stressful life events, loneliness, and more depressed mood, anhedonia and anxiety (p<.001 for most variables). These differences were clinically significant (Cohen's d>0.60 for most variables).

Conclusion

Type D personality can be reliably assessed in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes, and is associated with increased loneliness, stress and emotional distress in these patients.

Keywords: Clinical care, Personality, Psychology, Type 2 diabetes, Validation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3999(12)00022-0

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.01.006

Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 72, Issue 4 , Pages 251-257, April 2012