Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 267-277, September 2010

Diagnosing somatisation disorder (P75) in routine general practice using the International Classification of Primary Care☆☆

  • Rainer Schaefert

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Thibautstr. 2, Heidelberg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics; University of Heidelberg; Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Tel.: +49 (0) 62 21 56 86 49; fax: +49 (0) 62 21 56 57 49.
  • ,
  • Gunter Laux

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Claudia Kaufmann

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Thibautstr. 2, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Dieter Schellberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Thibautstr. 2, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Regine Bölter

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Joachim Szecsenyi

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Nina Sauer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre, Hamburg-Eppendorf and Hamburg-Eilbek (Schön Clinics), Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, Germany
    • Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Diaconate Hospital, Henriettenstiftung Kirchrode, Schwemannstr. 2-17, Hannover, Germany
  • ,
  • Wolfgang Herzog

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Thibautstr. 2, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Thomas Kuehlein

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, Heidelberg, Germany

Received 9 April 2009; received in revised form 4 May 2010; accepted 4 May 2010. published online 14 June 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

(i) To analyze general practitioners' diagnosis of somatisation disorder (P75) using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)-2-E in routine general practice. (ii) To validate the distinctiveness of the ICD-10 to ICPC-2 conversion rule which maps ICD-10 dissociative/conversion disorder (F44) as well as half of the somatoform categories (F45.0-2) to P75 and codes the other half of these disorders (F45.3-9), including autonomic organ dysfunctions and pain syndromes, as symptom diagnoses plus a psychosocial code in a multiaxial manner.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis of routine data from a German research database comprising the electronic patient records of 32 general practitioners from 22 practices. For each P75 patient, control subjects matched for age, gender, and practice were selected from the 2007 yearly contact group (YCG) without a P75 diagnosis using a propensity-score algorithm that resulted in eight controls per P75 patient.

Results

Of the 49,423 patients in the YCG, P75 was diagnosed in 0.6% (302) and F45.3-9 in 1.8% (883) of cases; overall, somatisation syndromes were diagnosed in 2.4% of patients. The P75 coding pattern coincided with typical characteristics of severe, persistent medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). F45.3-9 was found to indicate moderate MUS that otherwise showed little clinical difference from P75. Pain syndromes exhibited an unspecific coding pattern. Mild and moderate MUS were predominantly recorded as symptom diagnoses. Psychosocial codes were rarely documented.

Conclusions

ICPC-2 P75 was mainly diagnosed in cases of severe MUS. Multiaxial coding appears to be too complicated for routine primary care. Instead of splitting P75 and F45.3-9 diagnoses, it is proposed that the whole MUS spectrum should be conceptualized as a continuum model comprising categorizations of uncomplicated (mild) and complicated (moderate and severe) courses. Psychosocial factors require more attention.

Keywords: Diagnosis, ICPC, Medically unexplained symptoms, Primary health care, Somatisation disorder

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Author Contributions: Dr. Laux had full access to all study data and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analyses. Study conception and design: Schaefert, Kuehlein, Laux, Boelter, Sauer, Herzog, Szecsenyi. Acquisition of data: Kuehlein, Laux. Analysis and interpretation of data: Laux, Schaefert, Kuehlein, Schellberg, Kaufmann, Boelter. Drafting of the manuscript: Schaefert. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Schaefert, Kuehlein, Laux, Schellberg, Kaufmann, Boelter, Szecsenyi, Sauer, Herzog. Study supervision: Szecsenyi, Sauer, Herzog. Administrative, technical or material support: Szecsenyi, Sauer, Herzog. Final approval of the manuscript for publication: all authors.

☆☆ Funding/Support: This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Grant No. 01GK0301 (CONTENT), 01GK0303 (FUNKTIONAL) and 01GK0601 (speziALL).

PII: S0022-3999(10)00218-7

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.05.003

Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 267-277, September 2010