Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 439-446, May 2010

Commonalities and differences between the diagnostic groups: Current somatoform disorders, anxiety and/or depression, and musculoskeletal disorders

  • Kari Ann Leiknes

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Evidence-Based Practice, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Box 7004 St. Olavsplass, 0130 Oslo, Norway. Tel.: +47 22 25 50 00, +47 464 22 270 (Mobile); fax: +47 23 25 50 10.
  • ,
  • Arnstein Finset
  • ,
  • Torbjørn Moum

Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

Received 30 October 2009; received in revised form 2 February 2010; accepted 2 February 2010. published online 22 March 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

To identify the similarities and differences of risk factors and correlates of different groups of people fulfilling criteria for specified diagnostic groups according to current somatoform disorder (SDs) criteria, presence of anxiety and/or depression, and self-reported musculoskeletal disorders.

Methods

Participants of the Oslo–Lofoten general population cross-sectional study in 2000–2001 interviewed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) somatoform section were examined by comparing similarities and differences in 8 groups identified by cross-tabulation of current SDs, anxiety and/or depression, and musculoskeletal disorders. The current SDs group was computed from the CIDI somatoform section raw data, anxiety and/or depression from the CIDI diagnostic algorithms and musculoskeletal disorders by questionnaire and self evaluation.

Results

In the 2001 sample of 1668 (875 women and 793 men) participants, the following eight disorder groups were identified: (i) current SDs, n=49 (75.5% women) (ii) musculoskeletal (functional somatic disorders), n=327; (53.5% women) (iii) anxiety and/or depression, n=148 (73.6% women); (iv) current SDs with anxiety and/or depression, n=38 (73.7% women); (v) current SDs with musculoskeletal, n=44 (72.7% women); (vi) current SDs with anxiety and/or depression and musculoskeletal, n=34 (76.5% women); (vii) musculoskeletal with anxiety and/or depression, n=101 (66.3% women); and (viii) no disorders, n=927 (43.3% women). Commonalities and differences between current SDs, anxiety and/or depression, and musculoskeletal disorders are apparent. Impairment of outcomes and risk factor load is high in current SDs with anxiety and/or depression and musculoskeletal.

Conclusion

The data in this article could help toward the needed DSM-V and ICD-11 diagnostic revision of the SDs category.

Abbreviations: CIDI, Composite International Diagnostic Interview, CI, confidence interval, DSM-IV, Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, FSS, Functional somatic disorders, HSCL-25, Hopkins symptoms checklist 25-item scale questionnaire, MES, medically explained symptom, MSD, multisomatoform disorder, MUS, medically unexplained symptom, ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, SD, somatoform disorder, SDnos, Somatoform disorder not otherwise specified, OR, odds ratio

Keywords: Anxiety, CIDI, Comorbidity, Depression, Functional somatic syndromes, Somatoform disorders

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Work conducted at: Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine.

PII: S0022-3999(10)00074-7

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.02.003

Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 439-446, May 2010