Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 319-325, September 2010

The development of the irritable bowel syndrome-behavioral responses questionnaire

Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK

Received 13 August 2009; received in revised form 20 January 2010; accepted 28 January 2010. published online 17 March 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

Unhelpful behavior related to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is often targeted and expected to change in treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapies. However, no scale has previously been produced to assess these dimensions. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an IBS-specific behavioral responses questionnaire.

Methods

A total of 153 patients with IBS as diagnosed by a general practitioner completed the 28-item Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Behavioral Responses Questionnaire (IBS-BRQ). A total of 117 persons without IBS also completed the IBS-BRQ and were used as a control group. Tests of internal consistency and principal components analyses (PCAs) were performed on both sets of data.

Results

The scale was found to be both reliable and valid with a high degree of internal consistency for both IBS patients (Cronbach's α=.86) and controls (Cronbach's α=.89). The scale differentiated significantly between IBS patients and controls (F=221, P<.01). The PCA supported a two-factor solution in both sets of data. Two items were removed from the scale due to low discriminative ability. The criterion validity was high as evidenced by a strong correlation with the Cognitive Scale for Functional Bowel Disorders (CS-FBD) (r=.67, P<.001).

Conclusion

The IBS-BRQ is a valid and reliable scale that can be used for clinical as well as empirical purposes.

Keywords: Behavior scale, Irritable bowel syndrome, Scale validation, Unhelpful IBS behavior

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by a grant from the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. The work was independent of the funding.

PII: S0022-3999(10)00066-8

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.025

Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 319-325, September 2010