Original articleChronic fatigue syndrome: Is it one discrete syndrome or many? Implications for the “one vs. many” functional somatic syndromes debate
Introduction
In order to understand the cause or pathophysiology of an illness or disease the usual first step is to define the phenotype of that illness and then seek associations with putative risk markers. Without doing that, no amount of markers will be shown to be consistently associated with one distinct illness or disorder. The example of one particular “functional somatic syndrome” (FSS), namely, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), provides insights into the difficulties of trying to define the phenotype in the absence of the biomarkers that usually help us to define a disease phenotype in the first place, The literature about CFS also provides the possible solution to this problem for both CFS and for all FSSs in general.
Section snippets
Does a phenotype of CFS exist?
There are several operationalized criteria used for defining CFS [1], [2], [3]. These criteria provide reliability across different studies [4], but the tests of validity suggest that they do not “cleave nature at the joint” [5], omitting more patients that have chronic unexplained disabling fatigue than they include. At the same time, large empirical studies suggest that there is a more broadly defined phenotype of chronic unexplained fatigue with associated symptoms (thus a CFS) with good
Is CFS homogeneous or heterogeneous?
There have been several attempts to test the heterogeneity of CFS, using symptoms and demographic data to define the phenotypes [5], [6], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Some studies used principal components or other factor analyses to define the syndromes themselves, whereas others used latent class analysis to seek clusters of patients. The early studies found a broad phenotype in the majority and a separate polysymptomatic phenotype in the minority, labeled as a somatization disorder [11],
Is CFS part of another FSS?
A related but seemingly paradoxical issue is the need to explain the clinical associations between the FSSs. Why is CFS strongly associated with both chronic widespread pain (”fibromyalgia”) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) [13], [26], [27], [28]? Could it be that there is only one general functional somatic disorder [29], [30]? One way to answer these questions was attempted in a primary care prospective case-control study of risk markers of patients with fatigue syndromes (postinfectious
Are the risks for FSSs biological or psychosocial?
The Swedish twin study mentioned in the previous section suggested that risks were both genetic and environmental. Environmental risks can be biological and psychosocial [34], [35]. What are the psychosocial risks for CFS in particular and FSS in general, and are they specific for each FSS? The Swedish twin registry helps us out again in answering these questions. Kato et al. [34] used the registry to examine childhood risks for CFS and found that perceived stress and “emotional instability”
How might we seek further knowledge about how FSSs are both similar but different?
It may be possible that not all endophenotypes underlying specific or associated syndromes share the same generic risks for all FSSs, such as early life adversity. The next tranche of studies needs to test this possibility, as well as to test the validity and reliability of these potential endophenotypes in men and to seek etiological risks in a longitudinal study of endophenotypes, such as altered stress response related to early life adversity and its genetic associations. Longitudinal and
Conclusions
Chronic fatigue syndrome can be considered as a discrete FSS, made up of different subphenotypes, which we are beginning to understand by their underlying endophenotypes. At the same time, CFS shares common risk markers with other FSSs, which are both genetic and environmental. The environmental risks are both psychosocial and biological with interactions between them. This “both separate and combined” approach applies to all FSSs. In order to better understand and treat patients with complex
References (42)
- et al.
Predictions and associations of fatigue syndromes and mood disorders that occur after infectious mononucleosis
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Factor analysis of symptoms among subjects with unexplained chronic fatigue: What can we learn about chronic fatigue syndrome?
J Psychosom Res
(2004) - et al.
Somatic comorbidities of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic analysis
J Psychosom Res
(2008) - et al.
Functional somatic syndromes: one or many?
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
From fibrositis to functional somatic syndromes to a bell-shaped curve of pain and sensory sensitivity: evolution of a clinical construct
Rheum Dis Clin N America
(2009) Understanding the potency of stressful early life experiences on brain and body function
Metabolism
(2008)- et al.
The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study
Ann Intern Med
(1994) - et al.
Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
BMC Health Serv Res
(2003) - et al.
A report — chronic fatigue syndrome
J R Soc Med
(1991) - et al.
Chronic fatigue syndrome — A clinically empirical approach to its definition and study
BMC Medicine
(2005)
Chronic fatigue in a population sample: definitions and heterogeneity
Psychol Med
Are chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome valid clinical entities across countries and health-care settings?
Austral NZ J Psychiatry
The prevalence and morbidity of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective primary care study
Am J Public Health
A systematic review of chronic fatigue, its syndromes and ethnicity: prevalence, severity, co-morbidity and coping
Int J Epidemiol
Post-infective and chronic fatigue syndromes precipitated by viral and non-viral pathogens: prospective cohort study
BMJ
Can the chronic fatigue syndrome be defined by distinct clinical features?
Psychol Med
What is chronic fatigue syndrome? Heterogeneity within an international multicentre study
Aust NZ J Psychiatry
Latent class analysis of symptoms associated with chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia
Psychol Med
Phenotypes of chronic fatigue syndrome in children and young people
Arch Dis Child
The neuroendocrinology of chronic fatigue syndrome
Endocrine Rev
The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions
Am J Psychiatry
Cited by (41)
Heart rate variability in patients with somatic symptom disorders and functional somatic syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsThe associated features of multiple somatic symptom complexes
2018, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchPerception of induced dyspnea in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome
2018, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :So far, this paradigm has only been administered in FSS patients with medically unexplained dyspnea [8]. Given the debate on the specificity of different FSS [9–11] and the hypothesis that the deficit in symptom perception underlies FSS in general [3], the first goal of this study was to investigate whether results found in patients with medically unexplained dyspnea [8] extend to patients with fibromyalgia and CFS. The second goal of this study was to look for predictors of distorted symptom perception within the patient group.
Neural correlates of somatoform disorders from a meta-analytic perspective on neuroimaging studies
2016, NeuroImage: Clinical