Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 475-481, May 2010

The future of neuroscientific research in functional gastrointestinal disorders: Integration towards multidimensional (visceral) pain endophenotypes?

  • Adam D. Farmer

      Affiliations

    • Neurogastroenterology Group, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Centre for Gastroenterology, Blizzard Centre for Cell and Molecular Science, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • ,
  • Qasim Aziz

      Affiliations

    • Neurogastroenterology Group, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Centre for Gastroenterology, Blizzard Centre for Cell and Molecular Science, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • ,
  • Jan Tack

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathophysiology, Gastroenterology Section, University of Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Lukas Van Oudenhove

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathophysiology, Gastroenterology Section, University of Leuven, Belgium
    • Department of Neurosciences, Psychiatry Division, University of Leuven, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Center for Gastroenterological Research, University of Leuven, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, O & N I, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel.: +32 16346387; fax: +32 16345939.

Received 3 November 2009; received in revised form 15 December 2009; accepted 21 December 2009. published online 01 February 2010.

Abstract 

The growing evidence for a key role of psychophysiological processes in the etiopathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) originates from various sources, including epidemiological, psychometric, physiological, and behavioural studies. Functional neuroimaging has improved our knowledge about central processing of visceral pain, a defining feature of FGID. However, results have been disappointingly inconsistent, often due to psychosocial factors not being controlled for. In this paper, we aim to show that using integrated research strategies, encompassing a number of scientific disciplines, is critical to advancing our understanding of FGID. We will illustrate this by describing recent integrative studies that may serve as good examples. More specifically, future FGID neuroimaging studies should control for psychosocial factors and incorporate methods from other branches of neuroscience outside this field, especially cognitive, affective and autonomic neuroscience. We therefore propose a framework for the development of an integrative cross-disciplinary research strategy based on advancing our understanding of visceral nociceptive physiology in health as well as vulnerability and susceptibility factors for FGID. This approach will allow the identification of factors responsible for the inter-individual differences in visceral pain perception and susceptibility to chronic visceral pain, leading to the description of multidimensional (visceral) pain “endophenotypes.” These may represent the critical steps needed towards a pathophysiological, rather than symptom-based, classification of FGID, which may be more suitable for genetic association studies. This approach may ultimately culminate in individual tailoring of treatment, in addition to disease prevention, thereby improving outcomes for the patient and researcher alike.

Keywords: Autonomic nervous system, Endophenotype, Functional gastrointestinal disorders, Genetics, Neuroimaging, Visceral pain

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-3999(09)00544-3

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.12.006

Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 475-481, May 2010