Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 69, Issue 1 , Pages 9-15 , July 2010

Factors associated with prospective development of environmental annoyance

  • Frida Eek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Barngatan 2, Lund University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden. Tel.: +46 46 177437; fax: +46 46 177285.
  • ,
  • Björn Karlson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Kai Österberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Per-Olof Östergren

      Affiliations

    • Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund Universitiy, Lund, Sweden

Received 14 July 2009 ,Revised 24 November 2009 ,Accepted 1 December 2009.

References 

  1. Randolph TG. Ecologic Orientation in Medicine: Comprehensive Environmental Control in Diagnosis and Therapy. Ann Allergy. 1965;23:7–22
  2. Knave BG, Wibom RI, Bergqvist UO, Carlsson LL, Levin MI, Nylen PR. Work with video display terminals among office employees. II. Physical exposure factors. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985;11:467–474
  3. Knave BG, Wibom RI, Voss M, Hedstrom LD, Bergqvist UO. Work with video display terminals among office employees. I. Subjective symptoms and discomfort. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985;11:457–466
  4. Cullen MR. The worker with multiple chemical sensitivities: an overview. Occup Med. 1987;2:655–661
  5. Sparks PJ. Idiopathic environmental intolerances: overview. Occup Med. 2000;15:497–510
  6. Altenkirch H. Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS)–differential diagnosis in clinical neurotoxicology: a German perspective. Neurotoxicology. 2000;21:589–597
  7. Staudenmayer H. Idiopathic environmental intolerances (IEI): myth and reality. Toxicol Lett. 2001;1203:333–342
  8. Lessof M. Report of Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS) Workshop, Berlin, Germany, 21-23 February 1996. PCS/96.29 IPCS, Geneva, Switzerland. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1997;16:233–234
  9. Nimnuan C, Rabe-Hesketh S, Wessely S, Hotopf M. How many functional somatic syndromes?. J Psychosom Res. 2001;51:549–557
  10. Bailer J, Witthoft M, Paul C, Bayerl C, Rist F. Evidence for overlap between idiopathic environmental intolerance and somatoform disorders. Psychosom Med. 2005;67:921–929
  11. Rubin GJ, Nieto-Hernandez R, Wessely S. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly ‘electromagnetic hypersensitivity’): an updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010;31:1–11
  12. Carlsson F, Karlson B, Orbaek P, Osterberg K, Ostergren PO. Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning. Public Health. 2005;119:568–577
  13. Österberg K, Persson R, Karlson B, Carlsson Eek F, Orbaek P. Personality, mental distress, and subjective health complaints among persons with environmental annoyance. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007;26:231–241
  14. Persson R, Carlsson F, Österberg K, Karlson B, Ørbæk P. A Two-week Monitoring of Perceived Stress and Health Complaints Among Environmentally Annoyed Subjects. Scand J Psychol. 2008;49:345–356
  15. Das-Munshi J, Rubin GJ, Wessely S. Multiple chemical sensitivities: a systematic review of provocation studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118:1257–1264
  16. Rubin GJ, Das Munshi J, Wessely S. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosom Med. 2005;67:224–232
  17. Das-Munshi J, Rubin GJ, Wessely S. Multiple chemical sensitivities: review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;15:274–280
  18. Rubin GJ, Das Munshi J, Wessely S. A systematic review of treatments for electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Psychother Psychosom. 2006;75:12–18
  19. Bailer J, Witthoft M, Rist F. Psychological predictors of short- and medium term outcome in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI) and individuals with somatoform disorders. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71:766–775
  20. Witthoft M, Rist F, Bailer J. Evidence for a specific link between the personality trait of absorption and idiopathic environmental intolerance. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71:795–802
  21. Bailer J, Witthoft M, Rist F. Modern health worries and idiopathic environmental intolerance. J Psychosom Res. 2008;65:425–433
  22. Witthoft M, Rist F, Bailer J. Abnormalities in cognitive-emotional information processing in idiopathic environmental intolerance and somatoform disorders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2009;40:70–84
  23. Hausteiner C, Bornschein S, Zilker T, Henningsen P, Forstl H. Dysfunctional cognitions in idiopathic environmental intolerances (IEI)–an integrative psychiatric perspective. Toxicol Lett. 2007;171:1–9
  24. Carlsson F, Persson R, Österberg K, Karlson B, Hansen ÅM, Garde AH, et al. Salivary Cortisol and Self-Reported Stress Among Environmentally Annoyed Subjects. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:109–210
  25. Carlsson F, Merlo J, Lindstrom M, Ostergren PO, Lithman T. Representativity of a postal public health questionnaire survey in Sweden, with special reference to ethnic differences in participation. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34:132–139
  26. Bjorner JB, Kristensen TS, Orth-Gomér K, Tibblin G, Sullivan M, Westerholm P. Self-rated health. A useful concept in research, prevention and clinical medicine. Stockholm: Forskningsrådsnämnden; 1996;[Report No.: 96:9]
  27. Eriksson I, Unden AL, Elofsson S. Self-rated health. Comparisons between three different measures. Results from a population study. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:326–333
  28. Goldberg D, Williams P. A users' guide to the General Health Questionnaire.. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson; 1988;
  29. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:322–355
  30. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:340–349
  31. Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138:923–936
  32. Kiesswetter E, Sietmann B, Zupanic M, van Thriel C, Golka K, Seeber A. Neurobehavioral aspects of the prevalence and etiology of “multiple chemical sensitivity” (Verhaltenstoxikologische Aspekte der Prävalenz und Ätiologie “multipler chemischer Sensitivität”), In German Allergologie. 1999;22:719–735
  33. Österberg K, Persson R, Karlson B, Ørbæk P. Annoyance and performance of three environmentally intolerant groups during experimental challenge with chemical odors. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30:486–496
  34. Coggon D, Martyn C, Palmer KT, Evanoff B. Assessing case definitions in the absence of a diagnostic gold standard. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:949–952
  35. Bailer J, Witthoft M, Bayerl C, Rist F. Syndrome stability and psychological predictors of symptom severity in idiopathic environmental intolerance and somatoform disorders. Psychol Med. 2007;37:271–281
  36. Black DW, Okiishi C, Schlosser S. A nine-year follow-up of people diagnosed with multiple chemical sensitivities. Psychosomatics. 2000;41:253–261
  37. Lax MB, Henneberger PK. Patients with multiple chemical sensitivities in an occupational health clinic: presentation and follow-up. Arch Environ Health. 1995;50:425–431
  38. Terr AI. Environmental illness. A clinical review of 50 cases. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:145–149

PII: S0022-3999(09)00506-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.12.001

Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 69, Issue 1 , Pages 9-15 , July 2010