Journal Home
Search for

Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 95-97 (January 2009)


View previous. 20 of 22 View next.

The psychodynamically oriented Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Unit, University of Ioannina, Greece

Thomas HyphantisCorresponding Author Informationemail addressemail address, Christos Mantas, Venetsanos Mavreas

Received 28 May 2008; received in revised form 20 October 2008; accepted 20 October 2008. published online 25 November 2008.

Article Outline

Managing the referral

The database

Number of referrals

Training

Research

New initiatives

References

Copyright

The development of consultation–liaison (C–L) psychiatry in Greece has been described briefly previously [1]. We describe here the recently developed C–L Unit of the Department of Psychiatry of the University of Ioannina.

Between 1983 and 2006, C–L services had been offered by consultants of the psychiatry department in the general hospital. In December 2006, an independent C–L Unit was established, as a result of a reorganization of the Mental Health Network in the Ioannina County, following the establishment of new community psychiatry service. The psychiatric unit of our general hospital was divided into four services: the C–L Unit, the Brief Hospitalization Unit, the Low Security Unit, and the Outpatient Department.

The C–L Unit staff consists of two full-time and one part-time consultant psychiatrists, two full-time residents in psychiatry, one full-time and one part-time clinical psychologist, four PhD students, and four undergraduate medical students. The unit covers the inpatients in our 750-bed university general hospital. The Accident and Emergency Department is covered by the Psychiatric Department's 24-h service.

Managing the referral 

return to Article Outline

Inpatients are assessed within 24 h from the referral (unless there is an emergency situation) after a meeting with the patient's physician, a nurse, and the patient's family member (if available) has been held. Special attention is given to the patient's willingness to accept a psychiatric evaluation and, unless the patient is unable to do so, all patients are interviewed in private in an office on the ward. After assessment, a second meeting with the patient's physician and/or other staff members takes place, a brief psychiatric impression and advice is written in the patient's medical record, and a written psychiatric report is given to the physician.

Details of patients' referral to the C–L Unit are recorded and entered into our electronic database, developed especially for the unit.1 This includes information on the following: demographics; reason and source of the referral; people interviewed; days of hospitalization; brief description of the patient's current state; medical, surgery, and medication history; family history; detailed psychiatric history; developmental and social history; legal problems; life events; current physical examination; main current laboratory findings; present mental state examination; and diagnostic impressions according to DSM-IV criteria (all Axes including GAF).

The database prints an answer sheet of a Psychiatric Consultation Note immediately after the data had been keyed in, which includes the main findings of the psychiatric assessment; our diagnostic impression and suggestions; a brief therapeutic plan; our recommendations regarding the patient's capacity or suicidality; goals, objectives, and risks of the suggested therapy; and possible side effects of the suggested psychopharmacological agents.

A follow-up appointment during the hospitalization or after discharge is programmed either with our service or with the other services of the local Community Mental Health network, if needed. In selected cases, a brief psychodynamic psychotherapy (up to 12 sessions) is offered by an experienced psychotherapist (T.H.).

The therapeutic management of the patient's personality is regarded as an integral part of psychiatric treatment [2], and a brief explanatory formulation of the patient's psychodynamic and personality assessment is also recorded, according to Glenn Gabbard's recommendations [3]. This formulation is mainly based on fundamental elements of the doctor–patient relationship (see Ref. [4]), on the patient's ability to be involved in a psychotherapeutic relationship, and on the examiner's impression concerning possible repetitions of past relationship patterns creating problems in the present.

All cases are discussed at the weekly meeting of all the members of the C–L staff, under the director's supervision. In selected cases, a grand round is scheduled in cooperation with the medical or surgical department in which the patient is hospitalized. Specific C–L groups focusing on oncology, rheumatology, and physical medical rehabilitation have also been developed. These groups consist of one resident, one psychologist, and one or two PhD trainees and aim to offer advice and support to the staff and supportive psychotherapy in severely ill hospitalized patients.

The database 

return to Article Outline

In addition to the details described above, doctors are requested to routinely record the Health of the Nation Outcomes Scale (HoNOS) score at referral and at discharge to measure the problems patients have when admitted to the hospital and to monitor to what extent these problems have diminished at discharge.

Approximately 15% of referrals are regarded by the C–L consultants to be patients with chronic, physical, and mental health needs who require complex management and detailed discharge planning. These patients are routinely assessed using Mini-Mental State, GHQ-28, SCL-90, and WHOQOL-BREF scales. Although, as a rule, we use generic measures to permit valid comparison among patients with different diseases, in selected cases (e.g., depression in older adults), disorder-oriented measures are also administered (e.g., the Geriatric Depression Scale).

The majority of the C–L doctors so far complied with filling out the database. All C–L doctors, however, admitted that they had difficulty in filling out the electronic database during emergency consultation, and some were reluctant, stating that it was a time-consuming extra load on their routine work. Our electronic database, though, allowed for integration of patient care, educational profiling, and analyses for research, providing a unique bridge between daily patient care activities and ongoing research efforts.

Our initial experience with HoNOS showed that ratings at the referral may serve as a baseline against which subsequent measures can be compared, particularly for patients with complex needs or severe problems. However, although the completion rates of HoNOS at referral increased from 29% the first year to 72% the first 6 months of 2008, more interdisciplinary training is needed to be implemented in our service to improve consistency in use of HoNOS rating scores.

Number of referrals 

return to Article Outline

As shown in Table 1, the referrals almost doubled 1 year after the establishment of the fully developed C–L Unit but remained relatively stable in the first 6 months of 2008, indicating possibly that there is a tendency to reach a plateau. The most frequent referrals were from the following departments: General Medicine (16%), Orthopedics (14%), Oncology (9%), General Surgery (6%), Neurology (6%), and Rheumatology (6%). Nearly 40% of the referrals were from departments with previous cooperation in research projects. The most frequent reasons for a referral were history of mental illness (16.7%), confusion/agitation (14.6%), depression (10.3%), and unexplained medical symptoms (8.2%). The most frequent psychiatric diagnoses were depression (28.5%), delirium (22.8%), schizophrenia (7.1%), and adjustment disorder (5.7%).

Table 1.

Referrals before and after the establishment of the C–L Unit

Total visitsNew referralsFollow-up visitsRegistered in database (%)
1991–19921061060
Dec 2005–Dec 20066582843740
Dec 2006–Dec 2007114948366643.7
Jan 2008–June 200840325514872.5

Training 

return to Article Outline

A 27-h course in “Psychosomatics” is offered in the fourth year of our Medical School. Training of the residents in Psychiatry is based on the recently published Guidelines for Training in the C–L Psychiatry and Psychosomatics [5]. Rotation to C–L Unit, for 9 months, occurs during the second part of the residency. Residents are expected to perform at least 150 referrals during this rotation. Clearly designated individual supervision of residents is organized—once per week with each consultant and once every second week for psychodynamic supervision for continual care of patients seen in wards.

Research 

return to Article Outline

A number of research projects have been developed, focusing mainly on aspects of psychological distress in chronic medical conditions (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease [6], rheumatic diseases [7], [8], [9], diabetes [10], or glaucoma [11]). Studies on the decision-making preferences of cancer patients and risk factors associated with postpartum depression have been recently added to the research, the latter being funded by EU-European Social Fund and the Greek Ministry of Development.

New initiatives 

return to Article Outline

We are planning to perform more general educational activities, aiming to reduce the stigma of mental illness and change the hospital staff's attitude toward the mentally ill. Extension of the availability of follow-up psychotherapy with cognitive therapy is one of our priorities, following proper staff training. We have also started to develop mutual educational and clinical activities with the recently established Mobile Psychiatric Unit in order to achieve better continuity of care and promote mental health in primary care.

Specific features of this C–L service are the psychodynamic approach, the meetings with the patient's physician and patient's family members, the regular staff meetings, and the database. In these ways, we hope that our C–L service helps to avoid the separation of medical and psychiatric services and to promote a “holistic” approach to medicine.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Douzenis A, Lykouras L, Christodoulou GN. Consultation liaison psychiatry in Greece. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64:457–458. Full Text | Full-Text PDF (67 KB) | CrossRef

[2]. [2]Perry S, Cooper AM, Michels R. The psychodynamic formulation: its purpose, structure, and clinical application. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:543–550.

[3]. [3]Gabbard GO. Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice. 3rd ed.. American Psychiatric Press; 2000;.

[4]. [4]Hyphantis T, Arvanitakis K. Physicians' “compliance with treatment” in the context of consultation–liaison psychiatry: the role of “triangle” relationships and projective identification. Patient Preferences and Adherence. 2008;2:189–193.

[5]. [5]Söllner W, Creed FEuropean Association of Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics Workgroup on Training in Consultation–Liaison. European guidelines for training in consultation–liaison psychiatry and psychosomatics: report of the EACLPP Workgroup on Training in Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:501–509. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (133 KB) | CrossRef

[6]. [6]Hyphantis TN, Triantafillidis JK, Pappa S, Mantas C, Kaltsouda A, Cherakakis P, et al. Defense mechanisms in inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:24–30. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[7]. [7]Hyphantis TN, Bai M, Siafaka V, Georgiadis AN, Voulgari PV, Mavreas V, et al. Psychological distress and personality traits in early rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary survey. Rheumatol Int. 2006;26:828–836. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[8]. [8]Hyphantis TN, Tsifetaki N, Pappa C, Voulgari PV, Siafaka V, Bai M, et al. Clinical features and personality traits associated with psychological distress in systemic sclerosis patients. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:47–56. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (144 KB) | CrossRef

[9]. [9]Hyphantis TN, Tsifetaki N, Siafaka V, Voulgari PV, Pappa C, Bai M, et al. The impact of psychological functioning upon systemic sclerosis patients' quality of life. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;37:81–92. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (276 KB) | CrossRef

[10]. [10]Hyphantis T, Kaltsouda A, Triantafillidis J, Platis O, Karadagi S, Christou K, et al. Personality correlates of adherence to type 2 diabetes regimens. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2005;35:103–107. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[11]. [11]Pappa C, Hyphantis T, Pappa S, Aspiotis M, Stefaniotou M, Kitsos G, et al. Psychiatric manifestations and personality traits associated with compliance with glaucoma treatment. J Psychosom Res. 2006;61:609–617. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (142 KB) | CrossRef

Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece. Tel.: +30 2651097322.

1 Our database (in Greek) is available upon request to Thomas Hyphantis (tyfantis@cc.uoi.gr).

PII: S0022-3999(08)00490-X

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.10.010


View previous. 20 of 22 View next.