Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 63, Issue 4 , Page 453 , October 2007

Re: Burton et al., Journal of Psychomatic Research 2007;62:553–561

References 

  1. Burton C, Weller D, Sharpe M. Are electronic diaries useful for symptoms research? A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:553–561
  2. Caro JJ, Caro I, Caro J, Wouters F, Juniper EF. Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation?. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:683–691
  3. Drummond HE, Ghosh S, Ferguson A, Brackenridge D, Tiplady B. Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:21–26
  4. Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Heiberg T, Dammann KL, Dale O, Aanerud GJ, et al. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1480–1484
  5. Palermo TM, Valenzuela D, Stork PP. A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain. 2004;107:213–219
  6. Saleh KJ, Radosevich DM, Kassim RA, Moussa M, Dykes D, Bottolfson H, et al. Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:1146–1151
  7. Hufford MR, Shiffman S. Correspondence between paper and electronic visual analog scales among adult asthmatics. In: Paper presented at the Drug Information Association Statistics Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina. 2002;
  8. Food and Drug Administration . Draft Guidance for Industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Rockville, MD: FDA; 2006;http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/5460dft.pdf
  9. Smith MK, Jones I, Morris MF, Grieve AP, Tan K. “Implementation of a Bayesian adaptive design in a proof of concept study”. Pharm Stat. 2006;5:39–50
  10. Byrom B. Electronic diary solutions. Enhanced Collection of patient Reported Outcomes Data. European Biopharmaceutical Review. [Autumn] www.clinphone.com/files/item49.aspx2004;

PII: S0022-3999(07)00322-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.08.003

Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 63, Issue 4 , Page 453 , October 2007