Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 501-509 , April 2007

European guidelines for training in consultation–liaison psychiatry and psychosomatics: Report of the EACLPP Workgroup on Training in Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics

  • Wolfgang Söllner

      Affiliations

    • General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, General Hospital Nuremberg, D-90419 Nuremberg, Germany. Tel.: +49 911 398 2839; fax: +49 911 398 3675.
    • ,
  • Francis Creed

      Affiliations

    • University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • European Association of Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics Workgroup on Training in Consultation–Liaison

      Affiliations

    • Members: Annette Boenink (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Graca Cardoso (Amadora, Portugal), Silla Consoli (Paris, France), Francis Creed (Manchester, United Kingdom), Roland Burian (Berlin, Germany), Aasta Heldal (Oslo, Norway), Antonio Lobo (Zaragoza, Spain), Maximino Lozano (Madrid, Spain), Teresa Maia (Amadora, Portugal), Susanne Maislinger (Innsbruck, Austria), Philippe Renard (Liège, Belgium), Marco Rigatelli (Modena, Italy), Angelika Riessland-Seifert (Vienna, Austria), Wolfgang Söllner and Barbara Stein (Nuremberg, Germany), Frederic Stiefel (Lausanne, Switzerland), Peter Stix (Graz, Austria).

Received 29 June 2006

References 

  1. Mayou R, Huyse F The European Consultation–Liaison Workgroup. Consultation–liaison psychiatry in Western Europe. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1991;13:188–208
  2. Huyse FJ, Herzog T, Malt UF. International perspectives on C–L psychiatry. In:  Wise MG,  Rundell JR editor. The American psychiatric publishing textbook of consultation–liaison psychiatry. Psychiatry in the medically ill. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2002;p. 229–255
  3. Huyse FJ, Herzog T, Lobo A, Malt UF, Opmeer BC, Stein B, et al. European consultation–liaison psychiatric services: the ECLW collaborative study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;101:360–367
  4. Herzog T, Creed F, Huyse F, Malt UF, Lobo A, Stein B European Consultation Liaison Workgroup. “Psychosomatic medicine” does make a difference in the general hospital: historical background and empirical evidence from UK and German mental health consultation services. In:  Katona C,  Montgomery S,  Sensky T editor. Psychiatry in Europe: directions and developments. London: Gaskell; 1994;p. 143–151
  5. Söllner W, Stix P, Stein B, Franz M, Lampe A, Herzog T. Quality criteria for psychosomatic consultation–liaison service. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2002;152:528–535
  6. Herzog T, Hartmann A. Psychiatric, psychosomatic and medical psychological consultation and liaison activity in West Germany: results of a survey. Nervenarzt. 1990;61:281–293
  7. Iglesias EC, Zabala FS, Campos RR, Lozano SM. Teaching survey for consultation–liaison psychiatry. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2000;28:290–297
  8. Rothermundt M, Arolt V, Levy NB. German and American consultant psychiatrists evaluate their function: a contribution to quality improvement in consultation psychiatry. Nervenarzt. 1997;68:735–741
  9. Wahlstrom L. Psychiatric consultation–liaison in Sweden surveyed: a patchwork of reimbursement schemes, organizational structures and levels of ambition. Lakartidningen. 2003;100:120–124
  10. Smith GR, Clarke DM, Herrmann HE. Consultation–liaison psychiatry in Australia. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1993;15:121–124
  11. Swenson JR, Abbey S, Stewart DE. Consultation–liaison psychiatry as a subspecialty: a Canadian survey. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1993;15:386–391
  12. Ford CV, Fawzy FI, Frankel BL, Noyes R. Fellowship training in consultation–liaison psychiatry: education goals and standards. Psychosomatics. 1994;35:118–124
  13. Gitlin DF, Schindler BA, Stern TA, Epstein SA, Lamdan R, McCarthy T, et al. Recommended guidelines for consultation–liaison psychiatry training in psychiatric residency programs: a report from the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine Task Force on psychiatric resident training in consultation–liaison psychiatry. Psychosomatics. 1996;37:3–11
  14. Leentjens A. The European Association of Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics and its relation to the journal. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:1–2
  15. Dalkey NC. The Delphi method: an experimental application of group opinion. In:  Dalkey NC,  Rourke DL,  Lewis R,  Snyder D editor. Studies in the quality of life. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1972;p. 13–54
  16. Niklewski G, Diefenbacher A, Hohagen F. Weiterbildung in Konsiliarpsychiatrie: Vorgaben, Inhalte und Durchführung—Vorschlag für ein Curriculum. In:  Diefenbacher A editors. Aktuelle Konsiliarpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1999;p. 197–216
  17. Rigatelli M, Ferrari S, Uguzzoni U, Natali A. Teaching and training in the psychiatric–psychosomatic consultation–liaison setting. Psychother Psychosom. 2000;69:221–228
  18. Guthrie E, Creed F. Seminars in liaison psychiatry. London: Gaskell; 1996;
  19. Royal College of Psychiatry . Guidelines for teaching liaison psychiatry. Bull R Coll Psychiatr. 1988;12:389–390
  20. Lozano SM, Campos RR, Zabala FS, Iglesias EC. Training guidelines for linkage psychiatry. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2000;28:394–398
  21. Herzog T, Stein B, Söllner W, Franz M. Leitlinie und Quellentext für den psychosomatischen Konsiliar- und Liaisondienst (Guidelines for consultation–liaison services in psychosomatic medicine), In:  Rudolf G,  Eich W editor. Leitlinien Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie in Abstimmung mit den AWMF-Fachgesellschaften. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2003;p. 1–162
  22. Sno HN, deBoer WRN. Opleidingsrichtlijnen en onderwijsprogramma consultatieve psychiatrie: een voorstel. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie. 1994;36:597–603
  23. Hiltunen PM, Leppävuori A, Männikkö T, Sorri P, Aärela E, Lehtonen J. Training model for special competence in general hospital psychiatry in Finland. J Psychosom Res. 2006;61:737–738
  24. In:  Adler RH,  Herrmann JM,  Köhle K,  Langewitz W,  Schonecke OW,  von Uexküll T,  Wesiack W editor. Psychosomatic medicine. 6th ed.. München: Urban and Fischer; 2002;
  25. In:  Diefenbacher A editors. Aktuelle Konsiliarpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1999;
  26. In:  Levenson J editors. The American psychiatric publishing textbook of psychosomatic medicine. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2005;
  27. In:  Wise MG,  Rundell JR editor. Textbook of consultation–liaison psychiatry. Psychiatry in the medically ill. 2nd ed.. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2002;
  28. Cogbill KK, O'Sullivan PS, Clardy J. Residents' perception of effectiveness of twelve evaluation methods for measuring competency. Acad Psychiatry. 2005;29:76–81
  29. Johnson W, Frankel B, Muskin P, Schubert DS, Cohen-Cole S, Roberts J. Assessing residents' performance in C–L psychiatry: work in progress. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1994;16:88–95
  30. Orleans CS, Houpt JL, Trent PJ. Models for evaluating teaching in consultation–liaison psychiatry: III. Conclusion-oriented research. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1979;1:322–329
  31. Templeton B, Selarnick HS. Evaluating consultation psychiatry residents. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1994;16:326–334
  32. Kornfeld DS. Consultation–liaison psychiatry: contributions to medical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1964–1972

PII: S0022-3999(06)00503-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.003

Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 501-509 , April 2007

Article Tools