Journal Home
Search for

Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 121-127 (February 2005)


View previous. 12 of 22 View next.

Reconsidering the role of personality in placebo effects: Dispositional optimism, situational expectations, and the placebo response

Andrew L. GeersaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Suzanne G. Helferb, Kristin Kosbaba, Paul E. Weilanda, Sarah J. Landrya

Received 10 February 2004; accepted 18 August 2004.

Abstract 

Objective

Prior investigations have failed to find reliable personality differences in placebo responding. The present study tests the hypothesis that personality and situational variables interact to determine placebo responding.

Methods

Optimists and pessimists were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. In the first condition, the participants were told that they were to ingest a pill that would make them feel unpleasant (deceptive-expectation group). In the second condition, the participants were told that they were to ingest a pill that would make them feel either unpleasant or was an inactive substance (conditional-expectation group). Finally, a third group was told they were to ingest a pill that was inactive (control group).

Results

Pessimists were more likely than optimists to follow a negative-placebo expectation when given a deceptive expectation, but not when given a conditional expectation.

Conclusion

The personality variable optimism–pessimism relates to placebo responding when individuals are given a deceptive but not a conditional expectation. This suggests that personality and situational variables interact to determine placebo responding.

a Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606-3390, United States

b Department of Psychology, Adrian College, Adrian, MI, United States

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 419 530 8530; fax: +1 419 530 8479.

PII: S0022-3999(04)00609-9

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.08.011


View previous. 12 of 22 View next.