Editorial
Endogenous opiates and the placebo effect: A meta-analytic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.07.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the ability of placebo administration to reduce self-report of pain and to examine whether placebo-induced pain reduction might have physiological and psychological underpinnings.

Method

Forty-five effect sizes and 1183 participants from 12 studies were meta-analyzed for the effects of placebo and the opioid antagonist, naloxone, on self-report of pain.

Results

Analyses showed that placebo administration was associated with a decrease in self-report of pain, and a hidden or blind injection of naloxone reversed placebo-induced analgesia. Furthermore, there were significant between-group differences for type of pain (experimental vs. postoperative/clinical) for placebo studies.

Conclusions

The results support the literature illustrating that the belief and expectation of analgesia induces discrete physiological changes, leading to relief from pain, and this response may be mediated by endogenous opioids. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of the symbolic aspect of health care and mental health providers' words and context, and their potential impact on the course of illness and well-being.

Introduction

The placebo response has received attention in many different areas of medicine and science. Its effects have been studied in the context of whether it is truly an appropriate control condition for clinical trials of drugs and other medical or surgical treatments. While some reports estimate that between 25% and 60% of patients report improvement with placebo treatment across various clinical conditions, such as pain, asthma, cardiovascular diseases, and depression [1], [2], other reports have found little evidence supporting significant clinical effects [3].

The fact that physiological changes occur in response to an “inert” treatment, or a symbolic event, has important implications for many different therapeutic modalities. For example, it has been shown that medical context (i.e., all factors that comprise the atmosphere surrounding a patient, including the specific wording of statements made by doctors) has profound effects on the outcome of medical treatment, and this effect is modulated by specific neurochemical messengers [4]. Others have suggested that placebo-like factors may play a role in determining treatment outcome for general medical outcomes [5], as well as specific conditions, such as Parkinsonism [6] and clinical depression [7], [8]. For depression, these placebo-induced improvements can be mapped to changes in brain glucose metabolism [9], [10] and electrical activity [11].

The physiological mechanisms underlying the placebo response have been studied extensively but are not well understood. The most well-studied phenomenon with respect to biochemical changes comes from studies examining placebo-induced analgesia. Mediators implicated include endogenous opioids (e.g., β-endorphin; [12], [13], [14]), cholecystokinin [13], and dopamine [15].

Because studies in this literature are difficult to compare due to the variability of conditions, populations studied, and methodologies, there was a need to examine the significance and consistency of effect sizes across the literature. Past reviews in this area have either been qualitative reviews [16], meta-analyses examining placebo effects in clinical trials collapsed across a variety of clinical conditions [3], or are somewhat outdated [17].

The main objective of this meta-analysis was to provide a focused quantitative review of the effects of placebo analgesia and the plausible mechanisms underlying this phenomenon (i.e., opiate related). For the primary analyses, it was hypothesized that placebo administration (i.e., administration of an inert agent along with verbal communication, that the individual would be receiving an analgesic agent) would decrease the subjective rating of both nonexperimental (postoperative/clinical) and experimentally induced pain. Second, it was hypothesized that the antagonism of opiate receptors (via the administration of naloxone) would attenuate placebo-induced analgesia. Third, as an exploratory analysis, it was hypothesized that there would be a difference in placebo-mediated analgesia among the different types of pain because the literature in this area is variable.

Section snippets

Sample of studies

Studies were obtained using a computer-based literature search. The databases used were Medline (1966–2003), PsychINFO (1967–2003), and Mental Health Abstracts (1969–2003). Also searched were reference lists from review articles, empirical papers, and dissertations. Only studies available by June 2003 were included in the sample.

Studies, or portions of studies, included in this meta-analysis met the following inclusion criteria: (a) a published study, (b) written in English, (c) included pain

Description of study features

This study meta-analyzed 45 final effect sizes from a total of 1183 participants. Methods of pain induction included ischemia, injection of capsaicin, mild electric shock, or postoperative pain/clinical. The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 59 years. Eight studies reported the number of male (51%) and female (49%) participants by gender. Race and/or ethnicity were not reported in any study.

Studies were analyzed separately for two different outcome variables: (a) self-report of pain

Discussion

Overall, the data quantitatively support several decades of literature suggesting that the expectation of analgesia does indeed affect self-report of pain. It was found that a substance administered in full view of the individual, with the suggestion that the substance would alleviate pain, induced a significant reduction in the experience of pain, whether pain was experimentally induced or created by surgical experience. The effect size of 0.89 indicates that the average person treated with

References (37)

  • A Hrobjartsson et al.

    Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • F Benedetti

    How the doctor's words affect the patient's brain

    Eval Health Prof

    (2002)
  • B Starfield et al.

    The influence of patient–practitioner agreement on outcome of care

    Am J Publ Health

    (1981)
  • N Shetty et al.

    The placebo response in Parkinson's disease. Parkinson study group

    Clin Neuropharmacol

    (1999)
  • RP Greenberg et al.

    A meta-analysis of antidepressant outcome under “blinder” conditions

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1992)
  • RP Greenberg et al.

    Mood-mending medicines: probing drug, psychotherapy, and placebo solutions

  • HS Mayberg et al.

    The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • P Petrovic et al.

    Placebo and opioid analgesia—imaging a shared neural network

    Science

    (2002)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Effects of neurodynamic interventions on pain sensitivity and function in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial

      2022, Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)
      Citation Excerpt :

      While it has been believed that manual therapy techniques have a main biomechanical effect, the literature suggests the physiological mechanisms are neurophysiological in nature [8]. It is plausible that neural mobilizations may result in changes in alterations in blood flow of supraspinal pain centers in the brain similar to thoracic manipulation [10], or changes in descending opioid and dopamine production [43]. Further research is necessary to determine the exact physiological mechanisms resulting in improvements in sensory and motor changes in individuals with MS receiving neural mobilization observed in the current study.

    • A social affective neuroscience lens on placebo analgesia

      2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      This implied that the placebo effect reduced pain by engaging endogenous MORs, mimicking the effects of pharmacological opioid analgesics. The findings were later confirmed by meta-analysis [69] and positron emission tomography (PET) studies that measured MOR binding under placebo [38,70,71] or showed that placebo analgesia and opioid analgesia engaged similar rACC glucose release during painful stimulation [72]. In addition, fMRI studies demonstrated that brain responses to noxious stimuli in pain-related regions were diminished with placebo [73] (Figure 2), and that these reductions were abolished with naloxone administration [74].

    • Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain

      2018, International Review of Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Placebo effects have been suggested to affect more strongly postoperative or clinical pain than experimental pain. Several studies demonstrate higher and more enduring placebo effects in patients as compared to healthy participants (Sauro & Greenberg, 2005). Expectancy-induced placebo effects elicited a large placebo analgesic effect to both acute experimental and chronic pain, however, the placebo effects were unrelated to each other (Müller et al., 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text